Can you take good photos with normal digi camera, without Digital SLR? - great photos with your digital slr very helpful!
I have a Casio QV-5700 semi digi SLR. I have this camera for about 4 years. Photography is my hobby and passion. While Casio is not in the high reputation of the mark for classification as Nikon, Pentax, Leica, etc. I think this device is to be classified are particularly trustworthy. being photographed in the scene, images of life, but their photos very difficult to under exposure to light.
The idea to update my Digi camera came to me. Say that most of my friends and colleagues who have a digital SLR camera, large bulky. Some of them take great pictures, especially with the depth of cooling function, which seems useful for the photography event where you need to quickly understand the topic.
Should I or should I not move to digital SLR? How reliable, DSLR is not as expensive? I hope to find a versatile digital SLR, good pictures of a small exhibition and take works well in all weather. Some insights into my work. http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/roze_immun ...
Friday, January 29, 2010
Great Photos With Your Digital Slr Very Helpful! Can You Take Good Photos With Normal Digi Camera, Without Digital SLR?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Nikon is a good choice at low cost. All due respect to the first poster, but I do not know what Nikon thinks are more expensive than Canon. Nikon D40 camera has a 6.1 MP Digital SLR Camera with ED DX 18-55 lens for $ 599. The Canon cheapest on the market is the XT (if you can find) for $ 699. The Rebel XTi is $ 899 and both come with a sub-par 18-55. Blows from XTi D80, and is in the same price range.
The Nikon D200 is a powerful camera to $ 1499, and Canon has nothing in this price range that can compete well. Although the Canon 5D is better than a camera, the Nikon D200, twice as much (or more charges)
To start the light, the D40 is the best option. You do not have as many orders as D80 or XTi, but it is a great introduction chamber. And all the accessories you buy for him (lenses, flash can) be used on future Nikon digital SLR cameras.
Today is a good company and Canon make a good team. But forcing them to buy your scrap 18-55 in the XT and XTi packages. To achieve a similar goal, 18-55 ED D40, andor must at least spend more than $ 250. This means that the XTi is about $ 1150 compared to the West-D80 / 18-55 $ for 1100th
To reset the device very sophisticated, Nikon is the best option. And 6 MP is enough for your information. You can create a superb 20 "x30 print" prints without loss of detail, a sensor of digital SLR 6MP. 8 MP is nice, but not a "must have". Hell, if someone really want to really think that the megapixels are so important, I want to exchange a day, a new 8-megapixel for a used (but operational and functioning normally) 4-megapixel camera, while I to 4-megapixel camera selection in question. Why? Because I prefer a Nikon D2Hs Kodak P880. Go ahead and do a search and see what I mean.
Why Nikon 4.1 MP is more expensive? First, the sensor is much better. It is also physically larger (about 8 times larger) than the center and the digital compact camera. And the print quality is usually much, much more.
Now, more megapixels, a larger print, but the quality will not improve if the quality of the sensor was also improved.
Buy a camera based on megapixels (volume). They do not buy bottled water at the volume you buy quality. If the waste water was bottled Buy 1 get 4 free, buy water from a mountain spring, which at the same price, but not about special sales?
I would stick with a digital SLR under $ 800 for now. Go to your local Ritz / Wolf Camera store and test the Nikon D40 and Canon Rebel XTi. Choose what you feel "better in hand, because the result is the same. Photography skills are more important than the camera model you use. To feel comfortable and confident in his team.
No tool, but how they are used. Profetional know a photographer who uses a compact camera for some pictures from magazines.
Point-and-shoot cameras and digital SLR cameras have different properties (adavantages and disadvantages) for all depends on your needs, and sometimes I have a SLR preactical not great.
Exilm I bought a Casio EX-Z1000, 5 months and had an absolutely fantastic experience with it so far. Approximately $ 249 purchase of this camera is awsome. The quality of the pictures that I have had comparable or better than any camera larger than my own freinds. All the high quality of the exilm cameras are set small, easy to use and features. The disadvantage of a small camera without the zoom button. However, the 3x optical zoom is more than enough for one day, any time. Due to the fact that the camera is 10.1 megapixels, I had a picture of a butterfly about 4 feet, was able to when using the camera function and cutting Zoom, see clairity body hair. I've traveled so Austrialia and the Bahamas with this device and were disappointed in any way. It uses memory cards, which are widely available and affordable, SD. I suggest a 1 GB or more just for the fact that if you start recording, you will not stop. Ibought the Sandisk Extreme III 1GB card, which can make me over 230 photos. Another interesting feature is the camera, an integrated video capability, must have a decent quality. Although not recommended to register early stages of her son, is a great feature to have around for everyday use. I will be happy to show you some examples of the photos that you have to deal with this camera if you want to contact me icyblue1986@yahoo.com I tell all my freinds on nothing but the experience is hardly surprising that I have taken certainly recommend this camera, this model had. The image quality and convenience more than the absence of optical zoom. Personally, I would this product if for no other reason than convenience recommended to their small size allows you to have with you, and an injection of something funny, as when the more bulky SLR shall remain at home and collect dust. Hope this helps and good luck!
Exilm I bought a Casio EX-Z1000, 5 months and had an absolutely fantastic experience with it so far. Approximately $ 249 purchase of this camera is awsome. The quality of the pictures that I have had comparable or better than any camera larger than my own freinds. All the high quality of the exilm cameras are set small, easy to use and features. The disadvantage of a small camera without the zoom button. However, the 3x optical zoom is more than enough for one day, any time. Due to the fact that the camera is 10.1 megapixels, I had a picture of a butterfly about 4 feet, was able to when using the camera function and cutting Zoom, see clairity body hair. I've traveled so Austrialia and the Bahamas with this device and were disappointed in any way. It uses memory cards, which are widely available and affordable, SD. I suggest a 1 GB or more just for the fact that if you start recording, you will not stop. Ibought the Sandisk Extreme III 1GB card, which can make me over 230 photos. Another interesting feature is the camera, an integrated video capability, must have a decent quality. Although not recommended to register early stages of her son, is a great feature to have around for everyday use. I will be happy to show you some examples of the photos that you have to deal with this camera if you want to contact me icyblue1986@yahoo.com I tell all my freinds on nothing but the experience is hardly surprising that I have taken certainly recommend this camera, this model had. The image quality and convenience more than the absence of optical zoom. Personally, I would this product if for no other reason than convenience recommended to their small size allows you to have with you, and an injection of something funny, as when the more bulky SLR shall remain at home and collect dust. Hope this helps and good luck!
Yes, I think you can good pictures with the camera just a digi normal, but there are some limitations ...
However, if u intend to improve and change the DSLR arena,
u can try to go for the Canon 400D. This is a DSLR veri reliable and not so expensive ...
Wow! .. Your work is great ... I am a photographer and I can understand that you dielemma. My philosophy is that this photo of a hand has little to do with the camera, but you do not need a good camera to complicate things. A DSLR is not a bad choice, taking into account that a lot of help you. Canon and Nikon are both very good brands, but the choice depends on your budget. Nikon is a bit more. The Canon EOS-series is what to do with his Nikon D-Series Check out what is received at least 8MP. Do not buy a model-level "end-end, because things are these days cameras get better every day. To try wisely. To get something on eBay, or even digital SLR camera used to be found. All the best :-)
I grew up with the conventional SLR. Semi Pentax and Nikon. They were digitally with a compact () some years ago and has some nice pictures, but ...
I miss the speed of a digital SLR camera. Digital is the lag when you press the button when the image actually recorded. In the DSLR is that they are not true, looks like a film SLR. I miss it, in a position to the depth of field.
The downside, as you point out, is very important. My Compact is ideal for those times when I think about my light load, but the landscape has introduced a digital SLR camera and the volume.
I could always go further, like to try in the position for the eye to the viewfinder instead of seeing a small LCD screen when the sun has left behind.
I am now examining the digital SLR prices have dropped in recent years, but still very expensive. I turn the Nikon D80, have a few friends and swear on it.
Good luck.
Read the manual
learn to use a different configuration
try new things with the camera
is a good camera and you will do well
Read the manual
learn to use a different configuration
try new things with the camera
is a good camera and you will do well
His work is very promising and I like to experiment and look for unusual perspectives and lighting. How can we prove that it is necessary to find the best camera, have to make good photographs. But as you said it wanted more flexibility and so on. In addition to the Nikon D80, you should check the D40. It is relatively compact for an SLR and has a good pedigree. Www.KenRockwell.com fund, has made a review of the two models, and other / As. He has a freelance photographer in San Diego and his website, some interesting ideas on equipment and photography in general. Keep up the good work and congratulations for the courage, to his work to the criticism from around the world to open.
Post a Comment